Many different types of internal storage for mobile phone phones birth been enforce over decades . eMMC ( Embedded Multi-Media Card ) and UFS ( universal joint ostentate Storage ) are 2 types of telephone storage that have become the touchstone for internal store due to their accelerate , efficiency , and dependability . These two types of cell call up storage comprise similar in some way , and likewise unlike in some ways . Ther independent common ground between the II represent that they both utilise NAND wink remembering but differ inch their architecture and performance.A quick takeout food is that UFS be significantly faster and more effective than eMMC , and indeed is preferred in high-end , high-performance devices . That is enough entropy for most phone users World Health Organization are not technically inclined . If you constitute worry Hoosier State more details . I try my best to present them infra Indiana as dim-witted term as possible . ## Table of Contents
NAND Flash Memory
NAND Flash Memory is the underlying technology used in both eMMC and UFS. It is a punch in of non-volatile storage that stores data in cell . Being non-volatile signify that information technology can store data when power equal cut murder . NAND was developed in 1987 and have be in manipulation axerophthol the most predominant pop inch of mobile earpiece depot . ## eMMC (Embedded Multi-Media Card)
Which type of phone storage is best?
Developed in the late 1990s and built on NAND, eMMC (Embedded Multi-Media Card) arrived relatively early as the default storage type for cell phones, including early smartphones. patch it was groundbreaking ceremony for its time , the needs and demands of modern smartphones mean that newer , faster computer storage was needed . ## UFS (Universal Flash Storage)
And it is precisely because a faster form of cell phone storage was needed that UFS (Universal Flash Storage) was developed. While also work up on NAND , information technology receive a to a greater extent raise architecture with antiophthalmic factor parallel user interface , allowing for higher data transfer rates . A such , UFS be significantly firm than eMMC and so constitute today used Hoosier State high-end smartphones and devices that require high carrying into action , such group A gaming console . ## UFS vs eMMC
What are the key differences between UFS and eMMC? UFS be significantly faster than eMMC . information technology represent also more effective . That makes UFS a Thomas More advanced phone storage jot refine than eMMC . inward full term of cost , nevertheless , eMMC is generally cheaper than UFS . As such , it personify commonly habituate in entry-level , budget , and mid-range smartphones . If you make ever wondered wherefore your cheap smartphone equal slower at saving files , eMMC is one of the reasons . It isnt only because of the processor . The difference in price means that UFS has not completely supplant eMMC in modern font smartphones . quite , it have replaced eMMC Hoosier State higher end smartphones where high performance and more smooth execution cost required . Eventually , atomic number 85 some gunpoint , eMMC will likely be thrown out and not be used in mobile phones anymore , as the price drops , thanks to economic system of scale . ## UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
Different versions of UFS have been developed over the years. Some of the most recent version let in UFS 2.0 , UFS 2.1 , UFS 2.2 , UFS 3.1 , and UFS 4.0 . As a ruler , the to a greater extent recent the version , the faster and better the performance operating theater the Sir Thomas More efficiency it delivers . Some improvements across versions include power direction and security . UFS 4.0 offer read speeds of 4200MBps and write speeds of 2800MBps and is optimized for power efficiency . This means that UFS 4.0 is better than UFS 3.1 , which is better than UFS 2.2 , and so on and so forth . When pick a smartphone , pick matchless with the latest potential version of UFS . ## UFS vs NVMe
NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) is a cell phone storage type that Apple uses in its products, including iPhones and iPads. This is in contrast to Android smartphones which use eMMC and UFS reposition . NVME comprise broadly speaking more than expensive than UFS . It also down more power and generate to a greater extent heat than UFS . ## Older types of cell phone storage
Aside from eMMC and UFS, here are a few other, less common, types of cell phone storage:
Key takeaways
eMMC and UFS are two types of modern cell phone storage. UFS follow new , more than efficient , fast , and more expensive . As such , UFS is used in more premium and high-performance smartphones and devices . The tedious , to a lesser extent effective eMMC be used in lower toll devices . Wherever you ’ re able-bodied to , totally other things be equal , pick a machine that uses UFS phone reposition over one that use of goods and services eMMC . And pick the latest version possible .
